ultrasound its chemical physical and biological effects pdf

Ultrasound Its Chemical Physical And Biological Effects Pdf

File Name: ultrasound its chemical physical and biological effects .zip
Size: 1756Kb
Published: 08.05.2021

Effects of Ultrasound Technique on the Composition of Different Essential Oils

Read terms. Wharton, MD. This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed.

However, confusion about the safety of these modalities for pregnant and lactating women and their infants often results in unnecessary avoidance of useful diagnostic tests or the unnecessary interruption of breastfeeding. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are not associated with risk and are the imaging techniques of choice for the pregnant patient, but they should be used prudently and only when use is expected to answer a relevant clinical question or otherwise provide medical benefit to the patient.

With few exceptions, radiation exposure through radiography, computed tomography scan, or nuclear medicine imaging techniques is at a dose much lower than the exposure associated with fetal harm. If these techniques are necessary in addition to ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging or are more readily available for the diagnosis in question, they should not be withheld from a pregnant patient. Breastfeeding should not be interrupted after gadolinium administration.

With few exceptions, radiation exposure through radiography, computed tomography CT scan, or nuclear medicine imaging techniques is at a dose much lower than the exposure associated with fetal harm. If these techniques are necessary in addition to ultrasonography or MRI or are more readily available for the diagnosis in question, they should not be withheld from a pregnant patient.

The use of gadolinium contrast with MRI should be limited; it may be used as a contrast agent in a pregnant woman only if it significantly improves diagnostic performance and is expected to improve fetal or maternal outcome. Imaging studies are important adjuncts in the diagnostic evaluation of acute and chronic conditions. The use of X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, nuclear medicine, and MRI has become so ingrained in the culture of medicine, and their applications are so diverse, that women with recognized or unrecognized pregnancy are likely to be evaluated with any one of these modalities 1.

This document reviews the available literature on diagnostic imaging in pregnancy and lactation. Obstetrician— gynecologists and other health care providers caring for pregnant and breastfeeding women in need of diagnostic imaging should weigh the risks of exposure to radiation and contrast agents with the risk of nondiagnosis and worsening of disease.

Planning and coordination with a radiologist often is helpful in modifying technique so as to decrease total radiation dose when ionizing radiation studies are indicated Table 1.

Ultrasound imaging should be performed efficiently and only when clinically indicated to minimize fetal exposure risk using the keeping acoustic output levels As Low As Reasonably Achievable commonly known as ALARA principle. Ultrasonography involves the use of sound waves and is not a form of ionizing radiation. There have been no reports of documented adverse fetal effects for diagnostic ultrasonography procedures, including duplex Doppler imaging.

The U. However, it is highly unlikely that any sustained temperature elevation will occur at any single fetal anatomic site 3. The risk of temperature elevation is lowest with B-mode imaging and is higher with color Doppler and spectral Doppler applications 4. Ultrasound machines are configured differently for different indications.

Those configured for use in obstetrics do not produce the higher temperatures delivered by machines using nonobstetric transducers and settings. Similarly, although color Doppler in particular has the highest potential to raise tissue temperature, when used appropriately for obstetric indications, it does not produce changes that would risk the health of the pregnancy. However, the potential for risk shows that ultrasonography should be used prudently and only when its use is expected to answer a relevant clinical question or otherwise provide medical benefit to the patient 5.

When used in this manner and with machines that are configured correctly, ultrasonography does not pose a risk to the fetus or the pregnancy. The principal advantage of MRI over ultrasonography and computed tomography is the ability to image deep soft tissue structures in a manner that is not operator dependent and does not use ionizing radiation. There are no precautions or contraindications specific to the pregnant woman. Magnetic resonance imaging is similar to ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis, but when MRI is readily available, it is preferred because of its lower rates of nonvisualization 6.

Although there are theoretical concerns for the fetus, including teratogenesis, tissue heating, and acoustic damage, there exists no evidence of actual harm. With regard to teratogenesis, there are no published human studies documenting harm, and the preponderance of animal studies do not demonstrate risk 1.

Finally, available studies in humans have documented no acoustic injuries to fetuses during prenatal MRI 1. In considering available data and risk of teratogenicity, the American College of Radiology concludes that no special consideration is recommended for the first versus any other trimester in pregnancy 8.

However, there are diagnostic situations in which contrast enhancement is of benefit. Two types of MRI contrast are available: 1 gadolinium-based agents and 2 superparamagnetic iron oxide particles. Gadolinium-based agents are useful in imaging of the nervous system because they cross the blood—brain barrier when this barrier has been disrupted, such as in the presence of a tumor, abscess, or demyelination 9. Although gadolinium-based contrast can help define tissue margins and invasion in the setting of placental implantation abnormalities, noncontrast MRI still can provide useful diagnostic information regarding placental implantation and is sufficient in most cases 7.

Even though it can increase the specificity of MRI, the use of gadolinium-based contrast enhancement during pregnancy is controversial. Uncertainty surrounds the risk of possible fetal effects because gadolinium is water soluble and can cross the placenta into the fetal circulation and amniotic fluid. Free gadolinium is toxic and, therefore, is only administered in a chelated bound form. In animal studies, gadolinium agents have been found to be teratogenic at high and repeated doses 1 , presumably because this allows for gadolinium to dissociate from the chelation agent.

In humans, the principal concern with gadolinium-based agents is that the duration of fetal exposure is not known because the contrast present in the amniotic fluid is swallowed by the fetus and reenters the fetal circulation.

The longer gadolinium-based products remain in the amniotic fluid, the greater the potential for dissociation from the chelate and, thus, the risk of causing harm to the fetus 8.

The only prospective study evaluating the effect of antepartum gadolinium administration reported no adverse perinatal or neonatal outcomes among 26 pregnant women who received gadolinium in the first trimester More recently, a large retrospective study evaluated the long-term safety after exposure to MRI in the first trimester of pregnancy or to gadolinium at any time during pregnancy This study interrogated a universal health care data-base in the province of Ontario, Canada to identify all births of more than 20 weeks of gestation, from to The risk also was not significantly higher for congenital anomalies, neoplasm, or vision or hearing loss.

Limitations of the study assessing the effect of gadolinium during pregnancy include using a control group who did not undergo MRI rather than patients who underwent MRI without gadolinium and the rarity of detecting rheumatologic, inflammatory, or infiltrative skin conditions Given these findings, as well as ongoing theoretical concerns and animal data, gadolinium use should be limited to situations in which the benefits clearly outweigh the possible risks 8 To date, there have been no animal or human fetal studies to evaluate the safety of superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast, and there is no information on its use during pregnancy or lactation.

Therefore, if contrast is to be used, gadolinium is recommended. The water solubility of gadolinium-based agents limits their excretion into breast milk. Less than 0. Although theoretically any unchelated gadolinium excreted into breast milk could reach the infant, there have been no reports of harm. Therefore, breastfeeding should not be interrupted after gadolinium administration 13 Commonly used for the evaluation of significant medical problems or trauma, X-ray procedures are indicated during pregnancy or may occur inadvertently before the diagnosis of pregnancy.

In addition, it is estimated that a fetus will be exposed to 1 mGy of background radiation during pregnancy 2. Various units used to measure X-ray radiation are summarized in Table 1. Concerns about the use of X-ray procedures during pregnancy stem from the risks associated with fetal exposure to ionizing radiation.

The risk to a fetus from ionizing radiation is dependent on the gestational age at the time of exposure and the dose of radiation If extremely high-dose exposure in excess of 1 Gy occurs during early embryogenesis, it most likely will be lethal to the embryo Table 2 15 However, these dose levels are not used in diagnostic imaging.

In humans, growth restriction, microcephaly, and intellectual disability are the most common adverse effects from high-dose radiation exposure Table 2 2 With regard to intellectual disability, based on data from atomic bomb survivors, it appears that the risk of central nervous system effects is greatest with exposure at 8—15 weeks of gestation. It has been suggested that a minimal threshold for this adverse effect may be in the range of 60— mGy 2 18 ; however, the lowest clinically documented dose to produce severe intellectual disability is mGy 14 Even multiple diagnostic X-ray procedures rarely result in ionizing radiation exposure to this degree.

Fetal risk of anomalies, growth restriction, or abortion have not been reported with radiation exposure of less than 50 mGy, a level above the range of exposure for diagnostic procedures In rare cases in which there are exposures above this level, patients should be counseled about associated concerns and individualized prenatal diagnostic imaging for structural anomalies and fetal growth restriction Table 3 The risk of carcinogenesis as a result of in-utero exposure to ionizing radiation is unclear but is probably very small.

A 10—20 mGy fetal exposure may increase the risk of leukemia by a factor of 1. Thus, pregnancy termination should not be recommended solely on the basis of exposure to diagnostic radiation.

Should a pregnant woman undergo multiple imaging studies using ionizing radiation, it is prudent to consult with a radiation physicist to calculate the total dose received by the fetus. The Health Physics Society maintains a website with an ask-the-expert feature: www. There is no risk to lactation from external sources of ionizing radiation diagnostic X-rays Use of CT and associated contrast material should not be withheld if clinically indicated, but a thorough discussion of risks and benefits should take place 8.

In the evaluation for acute processes such as appendicitis or small-bowel obstruction, the maternal benefit from early and accurate diagnosis may out-weigh the theoretical fetal risks. If accessible in a timely manner, MRI should be considered as a safer alternative to CT imaging during pregnancy in cases in which they are equivalent for the diagnosis in question. Radiation exposure from CT procedures varies depending on the number and spacing of adjacent image sections Table 2.

For example, CT pelvimetry exposure can be as high as 50 mGy but can be reduced to approximately 2. In the case of suspected pulmonary embolism, CT evaluation of the chest results in a lower dose of fetal exposure to radiation compared with ventilation-perfusion scanning 2.

With typical use, the radiation exposure to the fetus from spiral CT is comparable with conventional CT. Oral contrast agents are not absorbed by the patient and do not cause real or theoretical harm. The use of intravenous contrast media aids in CT diagnosis by providing for enhancement of soft tissues and vascular structures. The contrast most commonly used for CT is iodinated media, which carries a low risk of adverse effects eg, nausea, vomiting, flushing, pain at injection site and anaphylactoid reactions 9.

Although iodinated contrast media can cross the placenta and either enter the fetal circulation or pass directly into the amniotic fluid 22 , animal studies have reported no teratogenic or mutagenic effects from its use 8 Additionally, theoretical concerns about the potential adverse effects of free iodide on the fetal thyroid gland have not been borne out in human studies Despite this lack of known harm, it generally is recommended that contrast only be used if absolutely required to obtain additional diagnostic information that will affect the care of the fetus or woman during the pregnancy.

Traditionally, lactating women who receive intravascular iodinated contrast have been advised to discontinue breastfeeding for 24 hours. Therefore, breastfeeding can be continued without interruption after the use of iodinated contrast 1 9 13 16 This type of imaging is used to determine physiologic organ function or dysfunction rather than to delineate anatomy.

Hybrid systems, which combine the function of nuclear imaging devices with computed tomography, improve the quality of information acquired and can help to correct artifacts produced by nuclear medicine imaging alone 9.

In pregnancy, fetal exposure during nuclear medicine studies depends on the physical and biochemical properties of the radioisotope. Technetium 99m is one of the most commonly used isotopes and is used for brain, bone, renal, and cardiovascular scans. Its most common use in pregnancy is in ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for detection of pulmonary embolism. In general, these procedures result in an embryonic or fetal exposure of less than 5 mGy, which is considered a safe dose in pregnancy.

The half-life of this radioisotope is 6 hours, and it is a pure gamma ray emitter, which minimizes the dose of radiation without compromising the image 9. All these facts support the safety of technetium 99m at 5 mGy when indicated during pregnancy.

Ultrasound

The objective of the experiment was to investigate the stability of the composition of selected essential oils in the model systems containing methanol and hexane solutions which were treated with ultrasound. The experiment has shown no significant effect on the composition of the essential oils resulting from the applied parameters of the process in the tested model systems. The study indicates that the sonication parameters adopted in the experiment can be applied in the case of analogous systems containing essential oils in their composition. Essential oils are aromatic substances, mixtures of various organic compounds. Approximately essential oils are manufactured on an industrial scale, but it is estimated that there are approximately 18 thousand oil-bearing plant species in existence on Earth. Each essential oil has its specific effect bactericidal, moistening, and medicinal and individual flavour citrus, spicy, floral, and herbal. The range of application of essential oils has expanded notably since they ceased to be confined to specialist laboratories and are now available to the general public via pharmacies and herb shops [ 1 — 3 ].

Read terms. Wharton, MD. This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. However, confusion about the safety of these modalities for pregnant and lactating women and their infants often results in unnecessary avoidance of useful diagnostic tests or the unnecessary interruption of breastfeeding. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are not associated with risk and are the imaging techniques of choice for the pregnant patient, but they should be used prudently and only when use is expected to answer a relevant clinical question or otherwise provide medical benefit to the patient.

Ultrasound

The comprehensive medical imaging program at UNLV is an innovative academic program designed to educate students in a foundation of mathematics and the sciences applicable to the interdisciplinary and applied science of diagnostic imaging. The program currently offers theoretical and clinical course work in the advanced level modalities of Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Ultrasound. Graduates of the program will meet the demand for professional personnel to perform patient imaging procedures on state-of-the-art advanced imaging systems, process and enhance computer images, prepare and administer contrast agents, maintain strict quality control guidelines, and conduct research in the comprehensive medical imaging area.

Ultrasound is sound waves with frequencies higher than the upper audible limit of human hearing. Ultrasound is not different from "normal" audible sound in its physical properties, except that humans cannot hear it. This limit varies from person to person and is approximately 20 kilohertz 20, hertz in healthy young adults. Ultrasound is used in many different fields. Ultrasonic devices are used to detect objects and measure distances.

Biological Effects of Acoustic Cavitation

New Methods of Food Preservation pp Cite as. Heat treatment and low temperature storage are at present amongst the main methods of food preservation. Unable to display preview.

PDF Download Ultrasound Its Chemical Physical and Biological Effects Read Online

Topics Basics of ultrasound in medical imaging Equipment and techniques to acquire ultrasound images Biological effects of ultrasound Thermal properties of ultrasound Acoustic properties of ultrasound Cavitation Introduction Ultrasound produces biological effects by two tissue interactions: heating and cavitation. Heating is caused by the mechanical friction of the tissue moving during passing of the ultrasonic wave. Cavitation is the production and collapse of small bubbles in the inter- and intracellular tissue fluid. Before discussing these mechanisms and their potential biological effects, it is useful to briefly discuss the properties of medical ultrasound and how it is clinically applied. The primary reason for the popularity of ultrasound is because it does not use ionizing radiation, which makes it especially appealing in obstetrical imaging. Procedures such as estimation of fetal age and determination of fetal position and placental localization can be accomplished with no ionizing radiation exposure to the fetus. Ultrasound is also used in cardiac imaging for determination of ejection fraction, detection of pericardial effusion, detection of wall motion abnormalities, and detection of vascular stenoses.

Once production of your article has started, you can track the status of your article via Track Your Accepted Article. Help expand a public dataset of research that support the SDGs. Announcement : Starting with the publications of Ultrasonics Sonochemistry will become an open access journal. Authors who publish in Ultrasonics Sonochemistry are now able to make their work immediately, permanently, and freely accessible. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry continues with the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.

Сьюзан рассеянно кивнула, но тут же вспомнила, как Танкадо отдал им Северную Дакоту. Она вглядывалась в группы из четырех знаков, допуская, что Танкадо играет с ними в кошки-мышки. - Туннельный блок наполовину уничтожен! - крикнул техник.

4 comments

Galilah R.

Thank you for visiting nature.

REPLY

Lewis M.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87, (); hc4hcommunityfair.org​/ · Kenneth S. Suslick and Wesley L. Nyborg. more PDF.

REPLY

Ampelio B.

These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

REPLY

Dalllottuaded

Bon iver sheet music pdf hedge fund risk management pdf

REPLY

Leave a comment

it’s easy to post a comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>